Screener
GEM vs GSSC
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF vs Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF
Key differences
- GSSC costs 0.15% less per year.
- GEM covers emerging markets markets; GSSC covers north america.
- GEM follows a index enhanced strategy; GSSC uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, GEM has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| GEM | GSSC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.5B | $952M |
| Since | 2015 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 2.03% | 1.10% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | north america |
| Strategy | index enhanced | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +45.2% | +31.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.7% | +17.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.7% | +7.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.02 | 0.72 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.07% | 18.61% |
| Max drawdown | -37.02% | -41.38% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GEM and GSSC
Explore further