Screener
GEME vs EMOP
Pacific NoS Global EM Equity Active ETF vs AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF
Key differences
- EMOP costs 0.05% less per year.
- EMOP is significantly larger than GEME — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EMOP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GEME | EMOP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.70% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $265M | $1.9B |
| Since | 2025 | 1995 |
| Dividend yield | 4.11% | 1.64% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +72.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.99% | — |
| Max drawdown | -16.86% | -12.87% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GEME and EMOP
Explore further