Screener
GENW vs ADIV
Genter Capital International Dividend ETF vs Guinness Atkinson Asia Pacific Dividend Builder ETF
Key differences
- GENW costs 0.40% less per year.
- ADIV is significantly larger than GENW — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GENW follows a index tracking strategy; ADIV uses active selection.
- ADIV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GENW | ADIV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.38% | 0.78% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5M | $55M |
| Since | 2025 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 2.64% | 2.78% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.7% | +19.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +17.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.85 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.78% | 13.26% |
| Max drawdown | -14.36% | -31.55% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GENW and ADIV
Explore further