Screener
GENW vs IDVZ
Genter Capital International Dividend ETF vs Polen International Dividend Income ETF
Key differences
- GENW costs 0.37% less per year.
- IDVZ is significantly larger than GENW — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GENW follows a index tracking strategy; IDVZ uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| GENW | IDVZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.38% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5M | $155M |
| Since | 2025 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 2.64% | 2.67% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.7% | +25.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.78% | 11.89% |
| Max drawdown | -14.36% | -10.99% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GENW and IDVZ
Explore further