Screener
GFGF vs WZRD
Guru Favorite Stocks ETF vs Opportunistic Trader ETF
Key differences
- GFGF costs 0.34% less per year.
- GFGF is significantly larger than WZRD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GFGF is classified as equity, while WZRD is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- GFGF follows a active selection strategy; WZRD uses structured outcome.
Side-by-side comparison
| GFGF | WZRD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.66% | 1.00% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $36M | $4M |
| Since | 2021 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.22% | — |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | +13.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.93 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.50% | — |
| Max drawdown | -27.99% | -71.81% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GFGF and WZRD
Explore further