Screener
GGRW vs RPG
Gabelli Growth Innovators ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF
Key differences
- GGRW costs 0.35% less per year.
- RPG is significantly larger than GGRW — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GGRW follows a active selection strategy; RPG uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, GGRW has delivered higher annualized returns.
- RPG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GGRW | RPG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.00% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $8M | $1.8B |
| Since | 2021 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 0.42% | 0.19% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +20.6% | +39.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +28.5% | +26.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.0% | +13.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.22 | 1.04 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.79% | 19.79% |
| Max drawdown | -50.28% | -36.58% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GGRW and RPG
Explore further