Screener
GK vs BEDZ
AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF vs AdvisorShares Hotel ETF
Key differences
- GK costs 0.22% less per year.
- GK is significantly larger than BEDZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, GK has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| GK | BEDZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.77% | 0.99% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $29M | $2M |
| Since | 2021 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.07% | 2.28% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +36.5% | +22.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.4% | +14.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.89 | 0.56 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.39% | 20.46% |
| Max drawdown | -47.72% | -29.70% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GK and BEDZ
Explore further