Screener
GKAT vs CEFS
Scharf Global Opportunity ETF vs Saba Closed-End Funds ETF
Key differences
- GKAT costs 2.02% less per year.
- GKAT is classified as equity, while CEFS is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
Side-by-side comparison
| GKAT | CEFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 2.61% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $158M | $402M |
| Since | 2014 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.46% | 6.24% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +24.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +21.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +13.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.39 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 9.92% |
| Max drawdown | -10.41% | -38.99% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GKAT and CEFS
Explore further