Screener
CEFS vs INKM
Saba Closed-End Funds ETF vs State Street Income Allocation ETF
Key differences
- INKM costs 2.11% less per year.
- CEFS is significantly larger than INKM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CEFS is classified as alternative, while INKM is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, CEFS has delivered higher annualized returns.
- INKM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CEFS | INKM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 2.61% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $402M | $76M |
| Since | 2017 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 6.24% | 4.88% |
| Asset class | alternative | mixed asset |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.3% | +14.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.5% | +9.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.7% | +4.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.39 | 0.84 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.92% | 5.98% |
| Max drawdown | -38.99% | -28.58% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CEFS and INKM
Explore further