Screener
GKAT vs FNDF
Scharf Global Opportunity ETF vs Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF
Key differences
- FNDF costs 0.34% less per year.
- FNDF is significantly larger than GKAT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GKAT follows a active selection strategy; FNDF uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| GKAT | FNDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $158M | $23.1B |
| Since | 2014 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 0.46% | 3.01% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global ex us |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +43.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +23.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +13.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.22 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 15.03% |
| Max drawdown | -10.41% | -40.14% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GKAT and FNDF
Explore further