Screener
GKAT vs SCHF
Scharf Global Opportunity ETF vs Schwab International Equity ETF
Key differences
- SCHF costs 0.56% less per year.
- SCHF is significantly larger than GKAT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GKAT follows a active selection strategy; SCHF uses index tracking.
- SCHF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GKAT | SCHF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.03% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $158M | $63.0B |
| Since | 2014 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 0.46% | 3.11% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global ex us |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +32.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +19.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +10.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.99 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 15.72% |
| Max drawdown | -10.41% | -34.87% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GKAT and SCHF
Explore further