Screener
GKAT vs GAL
Scharf Global Opportunity ETF vs State Street Global Allocation ETF
Key differences
- GAL costs 0.24% less per year.
- GKAT is classified as equity, while GAL is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- GKAT follows a active selection strategy; GAL uses tactical allocation.
Side-by-side comparison
| GKAT | GAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $158M | $307M |
| Since | 2014 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 0.46% | 3.18% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | tactical allocation |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +20.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +13.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.04 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 8.71% |
| Max drawdown | -10.41% | -28.31% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GKAT and GAL
Explore further