Screener
GKAT vs SCHC
Scharf Global Opportunity ETF vs Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF
Key differences
- SCHC costs 0.51% less per year.
- SCHC is significantly larger than GKAT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GKAT follows a active selection strategy; SCHC uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| GKAT | SCHC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $158M | $5.5B |
| Since | 2014 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 0.46% | 3.34% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global ex us |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +31.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +18.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.90 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 15.45% |
| Max drawdown | -10.41% | -43.94% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GKAT and SCHC
Explore further