Screener
GLOF vs EFG
iShares Global Equity Factor ETF vs iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF
Key differences
- GLOF costs 0.14% less per year.
- EFG is significantly larger than GLOF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, GLOF has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EFG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GLOF | EFG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.20% | 0.34% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $196M | $15.2B |
| Since | 2015 | 2005 |
| Dividend yield | 1.57% | 2.41% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global ex us |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.1% | +14.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.5% | +10.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.7% | +4.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.26 | 0.46 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.58% | 17.18% |
| Max drawdown | -34.12% | -35.78% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GLOF and EFG
Explore further