Screener
GLOF vs EPIN
iShares Global Equity Factor ETF vs Harbor International Equity ETF
Key differences
- GLOF costs 0.60% less per year.
- GLOF is significantly larger than EPIN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GLOF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GLOF | EPIN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.20% | 0.80% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $196M | $7M |
| Since | 2015 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.57% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.26 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.58% | — |
| Max drawdown | -34.12% | -11.64% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GLOF and EPIN
Explore further