Screener
GLOF vs OSEA
iShares Global Equity Factor ETF vs Harbor International Compounders ETF
Key differences
- GLOF costs 0.35% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, GLOF has delivered higher annualized returns.
- GLOF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GLOF | OSEA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.20% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $196M | $497M |
| Since | 2015 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 1.57% | 1.23% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.1% | +7.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.5% | +7.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.26 | 0.30 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.58% | 15.18% |
| Max drawdown | -34.12% | -18.14% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GLOF and OSEA
Explore further