Screener
GLOF vs LSAT
iShares Global Equity Factor ETF vs LeaderShares AlphaFactor Tactical Focused ETF
Key differences
Both GLOF and LSAT are equity ETFs. GLOF charges 0.20% a year and LSAT 0.99%. The main difference: GLOF follows a index tracking strategy; LSAT uses active selection.
- GLOF follows a index tracking strategy; LSAT uses active selection.
- GLOF covers global markets; LSAT covers North America.
- GLOF costs 0.79% less per year.
- GLOF is much larger than LSAT. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, GLOF has delivered higher annualized returns.
- GLOF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GLOF | LSAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.20% | 0.99% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $212M | $61M |
| Since | 2015 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 1.50% | 1.73% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.3% | +11.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.5% | +11.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.3% | +6.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.25 | 0.58 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.14% | 12.84% |
| Max drawdown | -34.12% | -20.48% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.