Screener
GLOW vs XNAV
VictoryShares WestEnd Global Equity ETF vs FundX Aggressive ETF
Key differences
- GLOW costs 0.55% less per year.
- GLOW is classified as equity, while XNAV is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- GLOW follows a index tracking strategy; XNAV uses active selection.
- XNAV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GLOW | XNAV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.72% | 1.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $52M | $31M |
| Since | 2024 | 2002 |
| Dividend yield | 1.17% | 0.51% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.0% | +41.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +24.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.06 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.37% | 16.40% |
| Max drawdown | -15.58% | -24.27% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GLOW and XNAV
Explore further