Screener
GMF vs ADVE
State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF vs Matthews Asia Dividend Active ETF
Key differences
- GMF costs 0.30% less per year.
- GMF is significantly larger than ADVE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GMF is classified as alternative, while ADVE is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- GMF follows a index tracking strategy; ADVE uses active selection.
- GMF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GMF | ADVE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $386M | $9M |
| Since | 2007 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 1.39% | 2.60% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.7% | +38.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.84 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.22% | 16.71% |
| Max drawdown | -40.18% | -18.41% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GMF and ADVE
Explore further