Screener
GMF vs MINV
State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF vs Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF
Key differences
- GMF costs 0.30% less per year.
- GMF is classified as alternative, while MINV is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- GMF covers emerging markets markets; MINV covers asia pacific.
- GMF follows a index tracking strategy; MINV uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, MINV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- GMF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GMF | MINV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $386M | $143M |
| Since | 2007 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 1.39% | 1.14% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | asia pacific |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.7% | +81.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.9% | +31.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.84 | 1.21 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.22% | 24.43% |
| Max drawdown | -40.18% | -23.49% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GMF and MINV
Explore further