Screener
MINV vs AAXJ
Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF vs iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan ETF
Key differences
- AAXJ costs 0.07% less per year.
- AAXJ is significantly larger than MINV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MINV follows a active selection strategy; AAXJ uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, MINV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- AAXJ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MINV | AAXJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.72% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $143M | $3.8B |
| Since | 2022 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 1.14% | 1.54% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | asia pacific |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +81.1% | +48.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +31.9% | +22.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +6.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.21 | 0.97 |
| Volatility 1Y | 24.43% | 19.80% |
| Max drawdown | -23.49% | -44.52% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MINV and AAXJ
Explore further