Screener
GMOM vs GVAL
Cambria Global Momentum ETF vs Cambria Global Value ETF
Key differences
- GVAL costs 0.35% less per year.
- GVAL is significantly larger than GMOM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GMOM is classified as alternative, while GVAL is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- GMOM follows a systematic alpha strategy; GVAL uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, GVAL has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| GMOM | GVAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.01% | 0.66% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $140M | $541M |
| Since | 2014 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 1.58% | 2.89% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | systematic alpha | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.5% | +37.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.4% | +25.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.3% | +13.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.71 | 1.17 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.57% | 14.47% |
| Max drawdown | -19.93% | -47.79% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GMOM and GVAL
Explore further