Screener
GMOM vs VAMO
Cambria Global Momentum ETF vs Cambria Value and Momentum ETF
Key differences
- VAMO costs 0.36% less per year.
- GMOM is classified as alternative, while VAMO is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- GMOM follows a systematic alpha strategy; VAMO uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| GMOM | VAMO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.01% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $140M | $83M |
| Since | 2014 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 1.58% | 0.62% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | systematic alpha | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.0% | +20.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.3% | +14.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.5% | +9.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.70 | 0.81 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.59% | 11.23% |
| Max drawdown | -19.93% | -41.83% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GMOM and VAMO
Explore further