Screener
GMOM vs TYLD
Cambria Global Momentum ETF vs Cambria Tactical Yield ETF
Key differences
- TYLD costs 0.42% less per year.
- GMOM is significantly larger than TYLD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GMOM is classified as alternative, while TYLD is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- GMOM follows a systematic alpha strategy; TYLD uses active selection.
- GMOM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GMOM | TYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.01% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $140M | $33M |
| Since | 2014 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 1.58% | 4.71% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | systematic alpha | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.5% | +4.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.3% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.71 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.57% | 0.75% |
| Max drawdown | -19.93% | -1.06% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GMOM and TYLD
Explore further