Screener
TYLD vs ENDW
Cambria Tactical Yield ETF vs Cambria Endowment Style ETF
Key differences
- ENDW costs 0.37% less per year.
- ENDW is significantly larger than TYLD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- TYLD is classified as fixed income, while ENDW is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- TYLD covers north america markets; ENDW covers global.
- TYLD follows a active selection strategy; ENDW uses multi strategy.
Side-by-side comparison
| TYLD | ENDW | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.22% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $33M | $139M |
| Since | 2024 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 4.71% | 2.21% |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | active selection | multi strategy |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.1% | +29.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 0.75% | 10.19% |
| Max drawdown | -1.06% | -6.44% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TYLD and ENDW
Explore further