Screener
GOAU vs GDXJ
U.S. Global GO GOLD and Precious Metal Miners ETF vs VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF
Key differences
- GDXJ costs 0.08% less per year.
- GDXJ is significantly larger than GOAU — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GOAU covers global markets; GDXJ covers north america.
- GOAU follows a active selection strategy; GDXJ uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, GDXJ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- GDXJ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GOAU | GDXJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.52% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $187M | $8.7B |
| Since | 2017 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 0.95% | 2.27% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +48.2% | +80.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +31.8% | +44.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +14.9% | +17.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.83 | 1.02 |
| Volatility 1Y | 45.60% | 49.42% |
| Max drawdown | -55.41% | -57.78% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GOAU and GDXJ
Explore further