Screener
GPT vs ACES
Intelligent Alpha Atlas ETF vs ALPS Clean Energy ETF
Key differences
Both GPT and ACES are equity ETFs. GPT charges 0.69% a year and ACES 0.55%. The main difference: GPT follows a active selection strategy; ACES uses index tracking.
- GPT follows a active selection strategy; ACES uses index tracking.
- GPT covers global markets; ACES covers North America.
- ACES costs 0.14% less per year.
- ACES is much larger than GPT. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- ACES has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GPT | ACES | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $23M | $145M |
| Since | 2024 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 0.67% | 0.54% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.7% | +55.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | -3.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -10.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | -0.03 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.85% | 33.45% |
| Max drawdown | -25.59% | -79.05% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.