Screener
GPT vs SBIO
Intelligent Alpha Atlas ETF vs ALPS Medical Breakthroughs ETF
Key differences
Both GPT and SBIO are equity ETFs. GPT charges 0.69% a year and SBIO 0.50%. The main difference: GPT follows a active selection strategy; SBIO uses index tracking.
- GPT follows a active selection strategy; SBIO uses index tracking.
- GPT covers global markets; SBIO covers North America.
- SBIO costs 0.19% less per year.
- SBIO is much larger than GPT. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- SBIO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GPT | SBIO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $23M | $162M |
| Since | 2024 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 0.67% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.7% | +63.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +18.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +2.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.59 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.85% | 29.61% |
| Max drawdown | -25.59% | -63.06% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.