Screener
GPZ vs ANGL
VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF vs VanEck Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF
Key differences
- ANGL costs 0.15% less per year.
- ANGL is significantly larger than GPZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GPZ is classified as equity, while ANGL is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- ANGL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GPZ | ANGL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $245M | $3.1B |
| Since | 2025 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | — | 6.31% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +9.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +8.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +3.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.88 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 4.34% |
| Max drawdown | -31.72% | -29.31% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GPZ and ANGL
Explore further