Screener
GPZ vs DMXF
VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF vs iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE Index ETF
Key differences
Both GPZ and DMXF are equity ETFs. GPZ charges 0.40% a year and DMXF 0.12%. The main difference: GPZ covers global markets; DMXF covers global markets excluding the US.
- GPZ covers global markets; DMXF covers global markets excluding the US.
- DMXF costs 0.28% less per year.
- DMXF is much larger than GPZ. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- DMXF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GPZ | DMXF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.12% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $245M | $1.1B |
| Since | 2025 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | — | 4.36% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global ex us |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +15.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +14.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +6.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.71 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 16.42% |
| Max drawdown | -31.72% | -34.52% |
Similar to GPZ and DMXF
Explore further