Screener
GPZ vs FDLO
VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF vs Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF
Key differences
- FDLO costs 0.25% less per year.
- FDLO is significantly larger than GPZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FDLO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GPZ | FDLO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $245M | $1.4B |
| Since | 2025 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.37% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +18.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +14.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +10.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.96 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 8.88% |
| Max drawdown | -31.72% | -34.35% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GPZ and FDLO
Explore further