Screener
GPZ vs PPH
VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF vs VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF
Key differences
- PPH is significantly larger than GPZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PPH has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GPZ | PPH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.36% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $245M | $966M |
| Since | 2025 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | — | 2.12% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +24.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +12.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +9.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.63 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 17.07% |
| Max drawdown | -31.72% | -29.70% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GPZ and PPH
Explore further