Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

PPH vs SMH

VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF vs VanEck Semiconductor ETF

PPH

VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF

VanEck

Annual cost

0.36%

Fund size

$966M

SMH

VanEck Semiconductor ETF

VanEck

Annual cost

0.35%

Fund size

$58.8B

Key differences

  • SMH is significantly larger than PPH — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last 3 years, SMH has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

PPHSMH
Annual cost (TER)0.36%0.35%
Fund size (AUM)$966M$58.8B
Since20112011
Dividend yield2.12%0.22%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+24.5%+139.4%
CAGR 3Y+12.6%+65.2%
CAGR 5Y+9.8%+38.8%
Sharpe 3Y0.631.52
Volatility 1Y17.07%30.31%
Max drawdown-29.70%-45.30%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to PPH and SMH