Screener
GPZ vs SMH
VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF vs VanEck Semiconductor ETF
Key differences
- SMH costs 0.05% less per year.
- SMH is significantly larger than GPZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SMH has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GPZ | SMH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $245M | $58.8B |
| Since | 2025 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.22% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +139.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +65.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +38.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.52 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 30.31% |
| Max drawdown | -31.72% | -45.30% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GPZ and SMH
Explore further