Screener
GPZ vs HAP
VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF vs VanEck Natural Resources ETF
Key differences
- HAP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GPZ | HAP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.41% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $245M | $316M |
| Since | 2025 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.86% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +47.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +18.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +11.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.92 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 14.91% |
| Max drawdown | -31.72% | -44.14% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GPZ and HAP
Explore further