Screener
PSET vs JGRW
Principal Quality ETF vs Jensen Quality Growth ETF
Key differences
- PSET costs 0.42% less per year.
- JGRW is significantly larger than PSET — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PSET follows a index tracking strategy; JGRW uses active selection.
- PSET has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PSET | JGRW | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.57% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $33M | $100M |
| Since | 2016 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.64% | 0.46% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +8.5% | +4.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.65 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.82% | 11.78% |
| Max drawdown | -34.74% | -14.63% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PSET and JGRW
Explore further