Screener
GRPZ vs PWB
Invesco S&P Smallcap 600 GARP ETF vs Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF
Key differences
- GRPZ costs 0.20% less per year.
- PWB is significantly larger than GRPZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PWB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GRPZ | PWB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3M | $1.9B |
| Since | 2024 | 2005 |
| Dividend yield | 0.90% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.0% | +47.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +34.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +18.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.45 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.85% | 18.57% |
| Max drawdown | -27.87% | -32.36% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GRPZ and PWB
Explore further