Screener
GSEU vs KONG
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Europe Equity ETF vs Formidable Fortress ETF
Key differences
- GSEU costs 0.64% less per year.
- GSEU is significantly larger than KONG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GSEU is classified as equity, while KONG is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- GSEU follows a index tracking strategy; KONG uses option income.
- Over the last 3 years, GSEU has delivered higher annualized returns.
- GSEU has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GSEU | KONG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.89% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $114M | $22M |
| Since | 2016 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 2.61% | 0.36% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +19.6% | +7.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.3% | +9.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.2% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.84 | 0.48 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.17% | 10.90% |
| Max drawdown | -35.71% | -19.98% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GSEU and KONG
Explore further