Screener
GSGO vs FYC
Goldman Sachs Growth Opportunities ETF vs First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund
Key differences
- GSGO costs 0.25% less per year.
- FYC is significantly larger than GSGO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GSGO follows a active selection strategy; FYC uses index tracking.
- GSGO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GSGO | FYC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.70% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $163M | $1.0B |
| Since | 1999 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.07% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +59.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +27.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +12.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.07 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 21.15% |
| Max drawdown | -13.88% | -47.85% |
Similar to GSGO and FYC
Explore further