Screener
GSGO vs OAEM
Goldman Sachs Growth Opportunities ETF vs OneAscent Emerging Markets ETF
Key differences
- GSGO costs 0.80% less per year.
- GSGO covers north america markets; OAEM covers emerging markets.
- GSGO follows a active selection strategy; OAEM uses index tracking.
- GSGO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GSGO | OAEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 1.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $163M | $100M |
| Since | 1999 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.63% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +57.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +21.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.93 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 22.18% |
| Max drawdown | -13.88% | -17.05% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GSGO and OAEM
Explore further