Screener
GSID vs GEM
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF vs Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF
Key differences
- GSID costs 0.15% less per year.
- GSID follows a index tracking strategy; GEM uses index enhanced.
- Over the last 3 years, GEM has delivered higher annualized returns.
- GEM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GSID | GEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.20% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.1B | $1.5B |
| Since | 2020 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 2.49% | 2.03% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.1% | +45.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.1% | +21.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.7% | +7.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.83 | 1.02 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.16% | 19.07% |
| Max drawdown | -29.89% | -37.02% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GSID and GEM
Explore further