Screener
GSIE vs KAT
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF vs Scharf ETF
Key differences
- GSIE costs 0.50% less per year.
- GSIE is significantly larger than KAT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GSIE follows a index enhanced strategy; KAT uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| GSIE | KAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5.6B | $688M |
| Since | 2015 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 2.55% | 0.39% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | index enhanced | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +21.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.87 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.23% | — |
| Max drawdown | -34.63% | -9.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GSIE and KAT
Explore further