Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

GSJY vs BBEM

Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF vs JPMorgan Betabuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF

GSJY

Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF

Annual cost

0.25%

Fund size

$84M

BBEM

JPMorgan Betabuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF

Annual cost

0.15%

Fund size

$853M

Key differences

Both GSJY and BBEM are equity ETFs. GSJY charges 0.25% a year and BBEM 0.15%. The main difference: GSJY covers the Asia-Pacific region; BBEM covers emerging markets.

  • GSJY covers the Asia-Pacific region; BBEM covers emerging markets.
  • BBEM costs 0.10% less per year.
  • BBEM is much larger than GSJY. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last three years, BBEM has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • GSJY has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

GSJYBBEM
Annual cost (TER)0.25%0.15%
Fund size (AUM)$84M$853M
Since20162023
Dividend yield1.75%2.72%
Asset classequityequity
Regionasia pacificemerging markets
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+25.9%+40.3%
CAGR 3Y+18.4%+20.3%
CAGR 5Y+8.4%N/A
Sharpe 3Y0.800.92
Volatility 1Y19.75%20.57%
Max drawdown-32.53%-17.42%

Similar to GSJY and BBEM