Screener
GTO vs PGHY
Invesco Total Return Bond ETF vs Invesco Global ex-US High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
Key differences
- GTO is significantly larger than PGHY — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GTO follows a active selection strategy; PGHY uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, PGHY has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| GTO | PGHY | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.3B | $212M |
| Since | 2016 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 4.75% | 7.09% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.9% | +8.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.7% | +9.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +0.1% | +4.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.23 | 1.00 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.47% | 4.95% |
| Max drawdown | -20.75% | -20.50% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GTO and PGHY
Explore further