Screener
GTO vs PVI
Invesco Total Return Bond ETF vs Invesco Floating Rate Municipal Income ETF
Key differences
- PVI costs 0.10% less per year.
- GTO is significantly larger than PVI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GTO follows a active selection strategy; PVI uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, GTO has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PVI has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GTO | PVI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.3B | $31M |
| Since | 2016 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 4.75% | 2.16% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.9% | +2.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.7% | +2.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +0.1% | +1.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.23 | -0.34 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.47% | 2.61% |
| Max drawdown | -20.75% | -1.16% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GTO and PVI
Explore further