Screener
GTO vs BAB
Invesco Total Return Bond ETF vs Invesco Taxable Municipal Bond ETF
Key differences
- BAB costs 0.07% less per year.
- GTO follows a active selection strategy; BAB uses index tracking.
- BAB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GTO | BAB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.28% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.3B | $1.0B |
| Since | 2016 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 4.75% | 4.05% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.9% | +7.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.7% | +4.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +0.1% | -0.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.23 | 0.08 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.47% | 5.97% |
| Max drawdown | -20.75% | -27.80% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GTO and BAB
Explore further