Screener
GTOQ vs VRP
Invesco High Yield Systematic Bond ETF vs Invesco Variable Rate Preferred ETF
Key differences
- GTOQ costs 0.11% less per year.
- VRP is significantly larger than GTOQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GTOQ is classified as alternative, while VRP is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- GTOQ follows a multi strategy strategy; VRP uses index tracking.
- VRP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GTOQ | VRP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $162M | $2.6B |
| Since | 2020 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 6.92% | 6.39% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | multi strategy | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +8.6% | +7.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.4% | +10.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.1% | +4.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.16 | 1.46 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.69% | 2.89% |
| Max drawdown | -15.96% | -46.04% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GTOQ and VRP
Explore further