Screener
GTOQ vs VRIG
Invesco High Yield Systematic Bond ETF vs Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF
Key differences
- VRIG costs 0.09% less per year.
- VRIG is significantly larger than GTOQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GTOQ is classified as alternative, while VRIG is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- GTOQ follows a multi strategy strategy; VRIG uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, GTOQ has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| GTOQ | VRIG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.30% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $162M | $1.5B |
| Since | 2020 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 6.92% | 4.86% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | multi strategy | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +8.6% | +5.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.4% | +6.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.1% | +4.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.16 | 2.92 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.69% | 0.50% |
| Max drawdown | -15.96% | -13.04% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GTOQ and VRIG
Explore further