Screener
GTOQ vs PGF
Invesco High Yield Systematic Bond ETF vs Invesco Financial Preferred ETF
Key differences
- GTOQ costs 0.16% less per year.
- PGF is significantly larger than GTOQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GTOQ is classified as alternative, while PGF is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- GTOQ follows a multi strategy strategy; PGF uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, GTOQ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PGF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GTOQ | PGF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $162M | $719M |
| Since | 2020 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 6.92% | 6.24% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | multi strategy | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +8.6% | +6.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.4% | +5.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.1% | -0.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.16 | 0.25 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.69% | 6.36% |
| Max drawdown | -15.96% | -28.92% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GTOQ and PGF
Explore further