Screener
GVAL vs ENDW
Cambria Global Value ETF vs Cambria Endowment Style ETF
Key differences
- ENDW costs 0.44% less per year.
- GVAL is significantly larger than ENDW — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GVAL is classified as equity, while ENDW is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- GVAL follows a active selection strategy; ENDW uses multi strategy.
- GVAL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GVAL | ENDW | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.66% | 0.22% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $541M | $139M |
| Since | 2014 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 2.89% | 2.21% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | active selection | multi strategy |
| CAGR 1Y | +38.5% | +30.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +25.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.19 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.49% | 10.21% |
| Max drawdown | -47.79% | -6.44% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GVAL and ENDW
Explore further